BREAKING: In a win for digital privacy, #SCOTUS reverses and remands the 6th Circuit’s ruling in Carpenter v. United States in that police need a warrant to get cellphone data

justinspoliticalcorner:

Huge: #SCOTUS holds that gathering location data held by cellphone companies is a 4th Am. search and requires a warrant. https://t.co/JLBTkAGJNA pic.twitter.com/GbiQ2nq4BH

— Brad Heath (@bradheath) June 22, 2018

https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

BREAKING: In a win for digital privacy, #SCOTUS reverses and remands the 6th Circuit’s ruling in Carpenter v. United States.

— Justin Gibson (@JGibsonDem) June 22, 2018

https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

Ruling in favor of Carpenter: Roberts (CJ), Kagan, Sotomayor, Breyer, Ginsburg
Ruling in favor of United States: Kennedy, Alito, Gorsuch, Thomas#SCOTUS

— Justin Gibson (@JGibsonDem) June 22, 2018

https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

In Carpenter v. US, #SCOTUS holds 5-4 that police need a warrant to get location information from cellphone towers. pic.twitter.com/vkPoIRlr2h

— Alliance for Justice (@AFJustice) June 22, 2018

https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

BREAKING: The Supreme Court holds that the acquisition of a defendant’s cell-site records ARE a Fourth Amendment search, meaning that a warrant generally would be required to obtain those records.

— Chris Geidner (@chrisgeidner) June 22, 2018

https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js