ayeforscotland:

noblepeasant:

ayeforscotland:

This poem by James Mitchie was published in the Spectator under editor Boris Johnson.

With his recent comments about bhurqas (https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/letters/boris-johnson-racism-niqabs-muslim-racist-vote-ethnic-minorities-a8479766.html) and his previous comments regarding Africa, everyone can be sure he’s a massive fucking racist.

English racism against Scotland never truly died, did it?

It did not.

He also recited a Kipling poem in front of a Buddhist temple that refers to the Buddha as an “idol made of mud.” Guy is such an obvious racist that I don’t understand why people make excuses for him (other then their own intellectual laziness and contrarianism).

deweydecimalchickens:

rush-keating:

wodneswynn:

wodneswynn:

So a lot of American xenophobia is informed by the fact that our news over-reports crimes committed by immigrants in Europe to such an extent that if you watch a lot of cable news you’ll deadass get the impression that every major European city is full of gangs of immigrants who just run around killing people all day and the European cops just watch it happen like “Alas, because of political correctness I can do nothing, if we try and stop and bloodbath we’ll be executed for racism.”

Which is of course, like, not true even a little bit, but it’s such a strongly-held belief that I’m not sure how to combat it.

I got into it the other day with a dude who was all like, “Yeah, it’s horrible that ICE is putting babies in baby jail and selling them for money, but isn’t it a necessary step to prevent the streets running red with blood like what’s happening in Europe??”

And you can’t just be all simplistic high-school-debate-team about it and just tell the poor fool that, no, that isn’t happening, because real-world political work is more complicated than that, but I ain’t yet got the hang of it.

California too for non-Californians. News reports California like it’s an apocalyptic wasteland. California also is “minority-majority” and conservatives link the two even if they’re not explicitly linked in the reporting.

It’s like when they claimed Muslims had filled Birmingham with no-go areas. Like, I LIVE HERE. I know that is simply not true. I grew up in a majority-Muslim area of Birmingham. It was fine. I was the only white girl in my primary school. We went to the mosque on a school trip. My parents still live there and I’m only a couple of miles up the road. Until this year the main site of my work was there. AND NOBODY DIED OF THE MUSLIMS. Calm down. Have a Rescue Remedy. 

But it’s really hard to argue with someone who has said something so ridiculous it’s Not Even Wrong. There’s not a great a deal of credibility to be had in just staring at someone with your jaw dropped and finally managing a “but… whuh… what the fuck?” Oh god, I’m actually supposed to debate that like it’s a reasonable proposition? Ah fuck, let me just recalibrate my brain… uh, I don’t think it dials back that far. The bit’s snapped off and now it’s just sparking. 

allthecanadianpolitics:

At Doug Ford’s inauguration as Premier of Ontario today, this guy showed up.

People with signs opposing Doug Ford were told to leave, but security let this islamophobia, racist, classist, anti-environmental piece of scum showed up.

His sign reads:

“Bring Back Carding, License Cyclists, Kill Carbon Taxes, Rescind Ontario Human Rights Commission (OHRC), Ban Black Lives Matter (BLM), Ban the Qur’an, Ban the Burqa, Privatize Services, Decertify Unions, City Hall Casino”

thecringeandwincefactory:

kropotkhristian:

drucila616:

earthmoonlotus:

heringstuff:

ragingvulvasaur:

rad-itzel:

gay-manticore:

I never could explain my issue with the Judeo-Chrustian God but this explains it. he is an abuser, all-powerful, all-knowing, punishes you if you upset him, ignores you if you please him. Was pissed the angels worshipped him unconditionally as they had no free will to do so, creates humans with free-will so they can Choose to worship him cus, come on I’m awesome, gets pissy when they choise not to worship him.

God is an abusive partner

I know a number of ex Catholics who experience PTSD-like mental health issues.

Religious trauma syndrome: https://theestablishment.co/the-hidden-trauma-of-life-after-fundamentalism-110946ab05f2

And Christians often interpret people struggling after leaving the faith as proof that the lack of faith is the problem rather than the brainwashing that really caused the problem.

I think it’s worth pointing out that this is much more of a *Christian* phenomenon than a so-called “Judeo-Christian” phenomenon, and Jewish people for the most part aren’t taught to think this way. (The concept of “God” is often less concrete in Jewish communities, and many Jewish people don’t even really believe in this concept.)

Also, just a general heads up: if you’re ever about to say “Judeo-Christian”, unless you’re Jewish or were raised Jewish yourself, consider that you might just wanna say “Christian”. It’s usually more accurate.

@kropotkhristian

A lot of really bad theology in the OP here. God is not the source of suffering – the absence of God is. God is not “stripping” you in order to force you to turn to him. Christians who teach that are bad Christians.

But also I agree with @earthmoonlotus – “Judeo-Christian” is a term specifically invented by conservative political pundits to justify both Islamophobia and hide their antisemitism. It isn’t a term accepted in academic history or theology.

@kropotkhristian – I don’t think that’s accurate. I graduated with a BA in Religious Studies in the mid-90s and we were using that term completely irrespective of politics. It was a means of describing commonalities between the “Big 3″/Abrahamic religions, and it was very apparent that the term was around for long before then. Wikipedia concurs.

I think you’re both right in that it used to be a neutral term (I’ve seen it used in a neutral way in pre-9/11 history books) but it’s been politicized in the post 9/11 environment.

solacekames:

Here’s another article for people who think that laughing about “Russian chaos agents” is funny and harmless.

Countering Kremlin disinformation is one area where Kiev has the upper hand.

By VIJAI MAHESHWARI

3/12/17, 10:30 PM CET Updated 3/15/17, 2:21 PM CET

KIEV, Ukraine — When “little green men” invaded Crimea in the spring of 2014, Russian media went into overdrive, smearing Ukraine’s Euro-revolution as a “fascist coup d’état.”

A group of professors and students struck back and unwittingly made history that spring when they launched StopFake.org, the first site to directly tackle and refute Russian propaganda. Now that the rest of the world has woken up to the Kremlin’s disinformation tactics, the journalism school crew behind StopFake have emerged as the “grand wizards” of the fake-news-busting world.

“There was a growing avalanche of propaganda from Russia seeking to reframe the narrative in the Kremlin’s favor, and we urgently needed to counterbalance that,” says Yevhen Fedchenko, the dean of Kiev Mohyla University’s journalism faculty and one of the founders of StopFake.

The site quickly gained a cult following by exposing false facts in anti-Ukraine Russian news reports. An aggrieved mother whose child was reportedly “crucified” by Ukrainian troops was “outed” as a popular Russian television actress in an article that was shared 11,000 times and later referenced in a press conference with Putin.

As a journalist covering Ukraine during the post-2014 barrage of Russian propaganda, I remember how the Kremlin’s fake news stories infected our most private moments and reframed the narrative.

But it was only after last year’s presidential election in the U.S. — when Russian fake news and cyberattacks were blamed for swaying the election in Donald Trump’s favor — that the site burst on to the global stage.

Almost overnight, the founders of StopFake went from provincial do-gooders to international media stars. Fedchenko and his colleagues were lauded at conferences and plied with offers of consulting work by nervous European governments. They now organize media workshops across the Continent, offering guidelines on recognizing and debunking Russian propaganda.

[…]

As the West scrambles to get a handle on the Kremlin’s propaganda tactics, Ukraine for once finds itself in a privileged position. Ukrainians lived through the Soviet Union, speak fluent Russian and can sift through Russian-language sites for clues about the inner workings of the Kremlin’s fakes news operations. They know the sites pumping out Kremlin disinformation and might even have met some of their editors in the past.

The site Ukraina.ru, for example — a Russian-language site from Moscow that peddles false anti-Ukraine stories — recently offered one of StopFake’s freelancers a full-time position.

“He turned down the job of course, even though the salary was very high,” says Fedchenko, who knows the editor-in-chief, a man who spent a few years in Kiev before the Maidan revolution. “We traced their offices to a building in Moscow that also houses other Kremlin-friendly sites like Sputnik and RIA Novosti.”

New urgency

As a journalist covering Ukraine during the post-2014 barrage of Russian propaganda, I remember how the Kremlin’s fake news stories infected our most private moments and reframed the narrative.

I recall an incredulous taxi driver telling me that a recent client from Moscow had insisted that the MH17 flight, which was downed over eastern Ukraine in July 2014, had been “stuffed with dead bodies.” He refused to pay the fare until the driver agreed with his version of events.

Fake reports alleged that the Ukrainian air force had targeted Russian President Vladimir Putin’s plane, which flew over the same region as MH17 one hour earlier. A journalist friend who was briefly detained in eastern Ukraine said the separatist soldiers had been incredulous the West could so openly support Kiev’s “fascist junta.”

Meanwhile, the Kremlin’s repeated assertions that there are no Russian troops or weapons involved in the conflict has created a convenient narrative for those who prefer to label it a “civil war” and not an act of Russian aggression.

Ukrainians are also intimately aware of the dangers of Russian propaganda, and the way it can infect the body politic with its dark messages.

Chopping the air feverishly with his hands, Fedchenko emphasizes that contemporary Russian propaganda had no inherent ideology and appealed to people’s basest instincts.

“Their messages are very fluid and seek to divide societies against themselves,” he says. “The Kremlin is against all international organizations like the NATO or the EU, and prefers that each country is forced to fend for itself.”

StopFake’s dire warnings about Russian propaganda and its nefarious designs have taken on new urgency in the context of upcoming presidential elections in both Germany and France, where there has been much talk about Kremlin disinformation campaigns against anti-Russian candidates.

Fedchenko explains that the case of the German-Russian teenager, Lisa — whose supposed rape by Muslim immigrants sparked mass protests by Germany’s millions-strong Russian community last year — was a classic example of Russian propaganda.

“They fabricated a rape to inflame passions among Russian speakers in Germany and discredit Merkel,” he says.

During a recent presidential campaign in Moldova, Russians also spread fake reports labeling the pro-European candidate a lesbian and accusing her of supporting “mass Muslim immigration.”

The pro-Kremlin candidate won the election.

Ukraine can’t turn back time. But for the rest of the Western world, it might not yet be too late. The government in Kiev has many Russian media outlets to counter fake news. And indeed, Fedchenko’s biggest regret is that “Ukraine hadn’t switched off Russian television 20 years ago.”

His eyes briefly become misty as he imagines a country completely free from the taint of Russian propaganda. If that had been the case, he says with renewed conviction, “we’d never have had the war in the Donbass to begin with.”

black-to-the-bones:

Islamophobia is REAL and we need to start a conversation about that.

1. Don’t text in Arabic.

2. Don’t scribble on your notepad.

3. Don’t speak Arabic on the phone.

4. Don’t speak Arabic to your friend.

5. Don’t ask for a glass of water.

6. Don’t ask for a harness for your child.

7. Don’t wear a beard.

8. Don’t make a pilgrimage.

9. Don’t ask for another Diet Coke.

10. Don’t upgrade to business class.

11. Don’t wear the wrong shirt.

12. Don’t sweat.

13. Don’t read a book.

14. Don’t be a Bollywood celebrity.

15. Don’t be 6 years old and have a common name.

16. Don’t complain about a four-hour delay.

17. Don’t switch seats.

18. Don’t watch a video on your smartphone.

19. Don’t look at a flight attendant.

20. Don’t look foreign.

21. Don’t have a Muslim name.

22. Don’t be a refugee.

23. Don’t live in Australia.

24. Don’t wear a turban.

25. Don’t be Sikh.

26. Don’t be Muslim.

SOURCE